Skip to content →
§ pillar guide · head construction · Art Students League lineage

The Reilly method

Frank J. Reilly taught head construction at the Art Students League of New York for over thirty years. His system is not about measurement — it is about three rhythm chains that carry the head's motion before any feature is drawn. The hairline curve, the cheek-and-jaw curve, the brow-and-mouth curve. Get those three lines right and the portrait has gesture before it has likeness. Get them wrong and no amount of anatomical accuracy will save it. This is the working artist's pillar on how Reilly's system is built, where it came from, and how it differs from Loomis and Bridgman.

First taught
c. 1935, Art Students League NY
Attributed to
Frank J. Reilly (1898–1967)
Origin culture
American academic tradition
Difficulty
Intermediate
Time to fluency
1–3 years regular practice
Prerequisites
Bridgman's Constructive Anatomy

In short

  • The Reilly method overlays three rhythm chains on a known anatomical structure. The chains plan motion; the structure provides accuracy.
  • Reilly taught at the Art Students League between roughly 1935 and 1967. His lineage runs from Frank V. DuMond and the French academic tradition back through nineteenth-century Paris.
  • It is not Loomis. Loomis's ball-and-plane system measures volumes; Reilly's rhythm chains describe flow across those volumes. Most ateliers teach them as complementary stages, not alternatives.
  • The three rhythm chains are the hairline-and-temple, the cheek-and-jaw, and the brow-and-mouth. Front view and three-quarter view each have their own variation of the same three chains.
  • The method's living transmission today runs through the Art Students League, Watts Atelier, Glenn Vilppu's workshops, and Robert Liberace's red-chalk demonstrations.
§ chapter one · the lineage

Origin and history

Frank Joseph Reilly was born in New York in 1898 and trained at the Art Students League under Frank V. DuMond, who was himself a student of Jules-Joseph Lefebvre and Gustave-Rodolphe Boulanger at the Académie Julian in Paris during the 1880s.1 The line back through DuMond to Lefebvre is what made Reilly's teaching feel French even though he never left the United States — the rhythm-line approach has its analog in the École des Beaux-Arts technique of la mise en place, the placing of the head's larger movement before its details.

Reilly began teaching at the League around 1935 and became one of its most influential instructors, eventually heading the portrait and figure department.2 Between 1935 and his death in 1967 he trained a generation of working portrait painters and illustrators. Frank Mason continued the tradition at the League and refined the rhythm-line teaching for a longer time horizon than Reilly's own classes had allowed. Daniel Greene took the system into pastel and became one of America's most commercially successful portrait painters of the second half of the twentieth century.3 Pruett Carter applied parallel rhythm thinking to magazine illustration; though Carter and Reilly were peers rather than student and teacher, the language they shared shows in their lecture notes.4

The Reilly tradition is unusual among twentieth-century drawing methods because it was almost entirely transmitted through teaching rather than print. Reilly published no instructional book — when people ask whether Reilly wrote a book, the honest answer is no, not in his lifetime. His method survives in the form of student notes, handouts photocopied across generations of classes, the demonstration drawings preserved by the League, and the published record of students such as Jack Faragasso, whose own teaching documents the rhythm system in print.5 The rhythm-chain construction is also widely called the "Reilly abstraction" — the abstracted scaffold of curves that sits beneath a finished portrait. Frank Mason eventually compiled a manual of Reilly's approach posthumously, but the most reliable accounts of what Reilly actually taught come from his living students' own teaching: Greene's instructional books, Robert Beverly Hale's parallel teaching at the League, and the late-career interviews where Reilly's students described his classroom in detail.6

What made Reilly's classroom distinctive

Reilly's classes were known for two things. First, he required Bridgman before he would teach you anything. George Bridgman had taught Constructive Anatomy at the League from 1894 until his death in 1943, and Reilly considered Bridgman's analysis of the skeleton non-negotiable groundwork for portrait drawing.7 Second, Reilly insisted that the rhythm chains be drawn before the features. Many of his demonstrations exist as drawings where the eyes, nose, and mouth are barely indicated while the cheek-and-jaw rhythm is fully resolved. The teaching point was that a head whose rhythm is wrong cannot be saved by accurate features, but a head whose rhythm is right reads as a portrait even when the features are summary.

The list of artists who passed through Reilly's classes is long enough that the method's modern reputation outruns the documented record. Andrew Loomis is sometimes called a Reilly student, but Loomis was Reilly's senior by six years and trained earlier. Norman Rockwell knew the League circle but trained elsewhere. The verifiable Reilly students who became influential in their own right include Daniel Greene, Frank Mason, Burton Silverman, and David A. Leffel — a roster that defines what twentieth-century American figurative painting looked like at its high end.8

§ chapter two · the system

The three rhythm chains

Reilly's central technical insight is that a head reads as a continuous flowing object rather than a collection of features. The eye does not, in the act of recognising a face, register the corners of the mouth before the line of the cheek; it sees the whole sweep of the side of the face and the features fall into place along it. To draw a head as the eye sees it, you must place the sweep first.

Reilly's three rhythm chains describe the three dominant sweeps. They are anatomical only in that they correspond loosely to underlying structures; their job is to plan motion, not to map bone. The chains, in the order Reilly taught them, are:

The three Reilly rhythm chains on a front-view head 1 · hairline & temple 2 · cheek & jaw 3 · brow & mouth
The three rhythm chains plotted on a generalised front-view head. The hairline curve carries the head's top movement; the cheek-and-jaw curve carries its side movement; the brow-and-mouth pair carry the cross-axis. Drawn as a working diagram; not a finished portrait.

The hairline-and-temple chain

This first chain runs from the centre of the forehead, out across the temple, down the side of the head, and into the start of the ear. It is one continuous flowing curve and it sets the top half of the head's gesture. If the sitter is tilted forward, this chain dips at the centre and rises at the sides. If the sitter is tilted back, it does the reverse. In a three-quarter view the chain becomes asymmetric — longer on the far side, foreshortened on the near side — and the asymmetry is the first thing the eye reads when it identifies a head as turned.

The cheek-and-jaw chain

This second chain is the most important. It runs from the temple, down through the zygomatic arch (the cheekbone), across the cheek, and into the line of the jaw. In Reilly's notes this chain is drawn as a single sweep, never broken at the cheekbone. The point is that the side of the face is one rhythm — the cheek and the jaw are not two separate features but two phases of the same curve. Reilly's demonstrations spend more time on this chain than on the other two combined.9

The brow-and-mouth pair

The third "chain" is really a pair of cross-axis curves: the brow ridge above and the line of the mouth below. Together they establish the head's tilt across its width. In a head that reads as turned slightly to one side, the brow and mouth curves are not parallel — the brow tips one way and the mouth tips the other, mirroring the cross-axis rotation that the cheek-and-jaw chain has already established. When all three rhythms agree, the head reads as solid in space before any feature has been resolved.

§ chapter three · front view

Constructing a front-view head

The front-view construction is the entry point. Reilly taught front view before three-quarter for a specific reason: front view forces you to deal with the symmetry of the rhythm chains before you deal with their asymmetry. If you cannot get the hairline curve to mirror itself across the central axis, you have no business attempting a three-quarter view where one side becomes longer than the other.

Start with a vertical axis and a horizontal eye-line at the head's halfway point — this much is shared with the Loomis method.10 Then place the hairline curve as a single sweep across the top of the cranium. Do not draw the features yet. Place the cheek-and-jaw chain on both sides, ensuring they are reflections of each other; if they are not, the head will read as warped no matter how accurate the features turn out. Place the brow ridge and mouth line last, both horizontal in a true front view.

Try it in the live tool

Open the Reilly head overlay and place it over a front-view reference photo. The three rhythm chains are pre-drawn as guides. Drag the overlay's anchor points to match the sitter's hairline, cheek, and brow positions. The overlay's chain-curvature controls let you adjust each rhythm independently — useful for sitters with strong jawlines or unusually high foreheads.

Open the Reilly overlay (front view) →

The most common failure mode at this stage is over-precision. Beginners want the cheek-and-jaw chain to be anatomically correct on the first pass. Reilly's instruction was the opposite — get the chain moving correctly first, then refine its precise path. A head with rhythms that are slightly inaccurate but flowing reads as a portrait. A head with rhythms that are accurate but stiff reads as a diagram of a face.

§ chapter four · three-quarter view

The three-quarter construction

The three-quarter view is where the Reilly system earns its reputation. In a turned head, the three rhythm chains all become asymmetric, and their asymmetry must agree. If the hairline curve favours the left and the cheek-and-jaw chain favours the right, the head will not read as turned — it will read as broken.

Reilly's procedure for the three-quarter is to commit to the cheek-and-jaw chain first, before placing any vertical axis. This is counterintuitive — most other systems (Loomis, Bridgman, the Bargue-derived atelier method) build the underlying volume before placing surface lines. Reilly's logic was that in a three-quarter view, the cheek-and-jaw chain is the volume. The side of the face describes the foreshortening more directly than any constructed sphere can.11

Three-quarter view Reilly rhythm chains 1 · hairline asymmetric 2 · cheek-jaw foreshortens 3 · brow + mouth tilt
Three-quarter view. The hairline chain is longer on the far side and shortens dramatically on the near side. The cheek-and-jaw chain on the far side is barely visible while the near-side chain becomes the dominant gesture of the head.

Once the cheek-and-jaw chain is committed to, the far side of the face can be sketched in as a shorter, foreshortened version of the same rhythm. The hairline chain follows: longer on the far side, sharply shortened on the near side. The cross-axis (brow and mouth) tilts in the direction of the turn — a head turned to its own right tips the brow slightly up on the viewer's right side and the mouth slightly down on the viewer's right side, completing the cross-axis rotation.

Try the three-quarter overlay

The Reilly overlay's three-quarter mode shows both the near-side and far-side rhythm chains. Study each chain in turn — and notice that the far-side cheek-and-jaw chain can drop away entirely and the head still reads as turned, because the near-side chain carries all the rotational information by itself.

Open the Reilly overlay (3/4 view) →
§ chapter five · profile

The profile view (and why it is hardest)

Reilly considered profile the hardest of the three views to teach, which is paradoxical because profile is often the first view a beginning student attempts. The reason: in profile, two of the three rhythm chains collapse onto the silhouette. The cheek-and-jaw chain is no longer a side-of-the-face rhythm — it has become the visible contour of the face itself. The brow-and-mouth pair are seen edge-on. Only the hairline chain remains as an interior line.

This means profile drawing concentrates all the information that was previously distributed across three rhythm chains into a single silhouette curve. Get that silhouette curve wrong by even a few degrees of forehead slope or jaw projection, and the entire likeness is gone. There is no rhythm to compensate with. Reilly's instruction for profile was therefore to slow down by an order of magnitude — to spend on the silhouette curve the same effort that would otherwise be spent on three separate rhythms.12

The profile view is also where the Loomis ball-and-plane construction becomes most useful as a check on Reilly. The Loomis sphere with its sliced-off planes establishes the cranium's volume independently of the silhouette, and the constructed jaw drops from the sphere along an anatomical hinge. If your profile silhouette disagrees with the Loomis-constructed volume, the silhouette is probably wrong. This is one of several places where the two systems pair productively rather than conflict.

§ chapter six · the figure

Beyond the head: rhythm in the full figure

Reilly's published focus was the head, but his rhythm logic extends to the whole figure with very little adjustment. Frank Mason and Glenn Vilppu both teach figure construction using the same rhythm-chain language: a torso has a shoulder-to-hip rhythm, a limb has a shoulder-to-elbow-to-wrist rhythm, and the figure as a whole has a head-to-feet line-of-action which is itself a single Reilly-style chain.13

The translation is mechanical. Wherever you would have asked "what is the rhythm of this side of the face," you now ask "what is the rhythm of this side of the torso." The cheek-and-jaw chain becomes the latissimus-to-external-oblique sweep on the side of the trunk. The hairline chain becomes the deltoid-to-trapezius curve across the top of the shoulders. The cross-axis brow-and-mouth becomes the shoulder line and the pelvic line, tilted against each other to register weight-shift.

For Grid Maker Pro overlay use: the same Reilly head overlay used for portrait construction can be applied to a full figure reference if you treat it as planning the head specifically. For figure-level rhythm, use the line-of-action overlay paired with the major-rhythm-chains overlay. The two are designed to be stacked.

Stack the head and figure overlays

In the tool, activate the Reilly head overlay and the figure rhythm overlay simultaneously. They will appear in separate colours so you can see how the head's rhythms continue into the neck and shoulders. The point is to plan the head as part of the figure, not as a separate object dropped on top of a body.

Stack both overlays →
§ chapter seven · the comparison

Reilly vs Loomis vs Bridgman

The three big American head-construction systems of the twentieth century all came out of the same Art Students League milieu — Bridgman taught there until 1943, Reilly from the 1930s until 1967, and Loomis (who never taught at the League) developed his system in parallel as a working illustrator with significant ASL influence. Their relationship is collaborative, not competitive, but the three methods ask for different first marks on the page.

Master comparison: three head-construction methods
Method First mark on the page Strongest at Weakest at Pair it with
Reilly The cheek-and-jaw rhythm chain Likeness from motion; portrait painting from life Anatomical teaching of underlying skull Bridgman for prerequisite anatomy; Loomis for profile checks
Loomis The cranial sphere with sliced planes Constructed volume; foreshortening; teaching the head as a 3D object Likeness; sitter's individual character Reilly for surface rhythm after volume is set
Bridgman The skull's bony landmarks Anatomical accuracy; understanding underlying structure Surface drawing; speed; portrait gesture Reilly or Loomis on top of Bridgman's foundation

The atelier-method consensus, as practised at Watts Atelier, the Florence Academy of Art, and most American academic studios in the 2020s, is to teach the three in sequence: Bridgman first (the skeleton you must know), then Loomis (the volume you must constructed), then Reilly (the surface rhythm that turns a constructed head into a portrait).14 Working portrait painters typically end up using all three simultaneously without thinking about which is which — Bridgman for the bone they cannot see, Loomis for the volume they are turning, Reilly for the curve they are committing to on the page.

§ practitioners · who built and continued the method

Famous practitioners

Frank J. Reilly (1898–1967)

Art Students League of New York · 1935–1967

The system's originator. Trained under DuMond; taught the head, portrait, and figure departments at the League for over thirty years. Left no published book; his teaching survives through student notes and the work of his students.

Frank Mason (1921–2009)

Art Students League · continued the Reilly tradition

Reilly's direct successor at the League. Taught the rhythm-chain system to multiple generations of students including the founders of Florence Academy of Art and several contemporary atelier instructors. Compiled the most-cited Reilly course manual.15

Daniel Greene (1934–2020)

Pastel portraitist · American Society of Portrait Artists

Reilly's most commercially successful student. Painted portraits of two US presidents, three Speakers of the House, and dozens of corporate boardroom commissions. His instructional books document the Reilly system applied to pastel as well as oil.

Burton Silverman (b. 1928)

National Academy of Design

Among the last living first-generation Reilly students. Continues to teach and paint in New York; his work has been collected by the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the National Portrait Gallery. Demonstrably uses the rhythm-chain construction in his preparatory drawings.

Robert Liberace (b. 1968)

Workshop instructor · Schuler School of Fine Arts

The most visible contemporary transmitter of Reilly-tradition red-chalk demonstrations. Liberace's workshop demos can be reverse-engineered as the three rhythm chains drawn in sanguine before any feature is committed to.

Glenn Vilppu (b. 1934)

Vilppu Studio · animation industry teacher

Trained under Reilly's circle at the League before moving into animation. His Vilppu Drawing Manual (1997) transmits the rhythm-chain logic to a generation of animators and concept artists, expanding the method's reach into film and games.

§ pitfalls · the doesn't-work-for cases

Common pitfalls

1

Skipping the prerequisite anatomy

Reilly's rhythm chains describe motion across the skull, not the skull itself. If you do not know where the zygomatic arch sits, the cheek-and-jaw chain will float free of the bone it should be tracking, and the head will read as soft.

Fix: work through Bridgman's Constructive Anatomy before attempting the rhythm system. Plan for 20–40 hours of anatomy work before your first Reilly construction.
2

Drawing the features before the rhythms

The single most common beginner error. Eyes, nose, and mouth are visually rewarding; rhythm chains are not. The temptation to render an eye before the cheek-and-jaw chain is committed to is almost overwhelming.

Fix: tape a piece of paper over the features area on your reference until the three rhythm chains are placed. If you cannot see the features, you cannot draw them prematurely.
3

Treating the cheek-and-jaw chain as two lines

Many students draw the cheekbone as one line, lift the pencil, and draw the jaw as another. Reilly insisted on one continuous sweep. The break in the line will read in the finished portrait as a break in the form, no matter how well you blend it in the rendering stage.

Fix: practice the cheek-and-jaw chain as a single calligraphic stroke, repeatedly, on scrap paper. The arm should know the curve before the eye gets involved.
4

Applying Reilly to photo reference uncritically

A camera lens shorter than ~85mm distorts head proportions and flattens the rhythm chains. A wide-angle selfie has hairline and cheek rhythms that do not exist on the actual sitter's head. Drawing what the photo shows produces a wrong portrait that is technically accurate to the wrong reference.

Fix: only use photo reference shot at portrait focal lengths (85mm–135mm equivalent). If you must work from a wider-lens photo, mentally restore the rhythm chains to what they would be on the actual head before drawing.
5

Forgetting that Reilly is one of three systems, not a complete one

Some students adopt Reilly as their only head-construction method and reject Loomis volume work or Bridgman anatomy as redundant. They produce portraits with strong surface rhythm but weak underlying form, especially in unusual lighting.

Fix: keep all three systems in active rotation. Use Bridgman for the daily anatomy refresher, Loomis for any view you've not drawn before, Reilly for the actual portrait. The three are designed to work together.

"Reilly taught us to draw the head as one continuous motion, not as a set of separated parts. The features come at the end, almost as an afterthought, because by the time you place them the head already exists on the page. That is the lesson, and it took most of us a decade to understand it."

Daniel Greene, recalled in interview with American Artist magazine (2010)3

Frequently asked questions

What is the Reilly method?
A head-construction system developed by Frank J. Reilly at the Art Students League of New York between roughly 1935 and his death in 1967. Reilly overlaid rhythmic chains of curves on the underlying skull so a portrait could be planned for movement, not just measurement. Three rhythm lines — hairline, cheek-and-jaw, brow-and-mouth — carry the head's gesture even before features are drawn.
Is the Reilly method the same as the Loomis method?
No. Andrew Loomis's ball-and-plane system (Drawing the Head and Hands, 1956) is geometric and proportional. Reilly's system is rhythmic and gestural. They share an anatomy foundation and are often taught back-to-back, but the marks they ask you to make are different — Loomis sets up a measured volume; Reilly establishes a felt flow.
Where can I learn the Reilly method today?
Directly at the Art Students League of New York, where Reilly taught for over thirty years and where the tradition continues through instructors including Frank Mason's students. Outside the League, Glenn Vilppu, Robert Liberace, and Watts Atelier transmit Reilly-tradition methods in workshops and recorded courses.
Did Norman Rockwell study with Reilly?
Not formally. Rockwell trained at the Art Students League before Reilly's tenure became established, but Rockwell and Reilly knew each other through the League and the Society of Illustrators. Pruett Carter, Reilly's contemporary and a major illustration teacher, has a more direct documented connection to the Rockwell-era illustration scene.
Do I need to know anatomy first?
Yes. Reilly's rhythm chains only make sense if you already know what's underneath them. Most Reilly instructors require George Bridgman's Constructive Anatomy or equivalent before introducing the rhythm system. The chains describe motion across structures you already understand; they don't invent the structures.
Is the Reilly method only for the head?
Reilly's published teaching focused on the head, but the same rhythm-line principle extends to the whole figure. Frank Mason and Daniel Greene applied Reilly's logic to torso and limb construction in their own teaching. Vilppu's Drawing Manual treats the entire figure with comparable rhythm thinking.
Is the Reilly method good for digital painters?
Yes, with one caveat. The rhythm lines work as a planning layer in any medium — many digital portrait painters lay Reilly rhythms on a low-opacity sketch layer before committing to value. The caveat: the speed at which digital lets you erase rewards laziness, and Reilly's whole value is committing to a felt gesture before refining it. Use the method to slow yourself down.
How long does it take to learn?
The geometry is teachable in a weekend. The feel for rhythm — knowing which curve sits where on which subject — takes between one and three years of regular practice. Reilly himself spent thirty years teaching the system; his more advanced students were ten years deep before they considered themselves proficient.
What pencils or media did Reilly use?
Vine charcoal and conte for instruction; brush and oil paint for finished work. The rhythm-line system is medium-agnostic — Daniel Greene applied it in pastel, Robert Liberace teaches it in red chalk, modern instructors use ballpoint pen for travel sketchbooks. The mark-maker matters less than the curves you commit to.
Can I use Reilly rhythms with photo reference?
Yes, and it is the most productive use case for many working portrait painters. Lay the rhythm chains on top of the reference photo before you trust what the photo is showing you. Photos flatten and shorten the rhythms that the eye reads from a sitter in person; Reilly's lines restore the head's three-dimensional flow on a flat reference.
What does 'rhythm' mean in this context?
Rhythm in Reilly's usage is the way a connected sequence of curves carries the eye across a form. It is not about regular repetition like a heartbeat — it is about continuity of motion. The forehead-to-cheek-to-jaw chain, drawn as one flowing line rather than three separate features, is a rhythm in the Reilly sense.
How does Reilly compare to the Bargue method?
Bargue is measurement; Reilly is motion. Charles Bargue's lithograph plates (1866–1871) train the student to copy a master drawing by exact measured triangulation. Reilly trains the student to feel where the rhythm goes and commit to it freehand. The two methods are not in conflict — Bargue builds the eye, Reilly builds the wrist. Many ateliers teach Bargue first, then Reilly.
Are there Reilly classes outside New York?
Yes. Watts Atelier in San Diego, the Studio Incamminati in Philadelphia, Grand Central Atelier (Long Island City), and several European ateliers transmit Reilly-derived teaching. Online, the New Masters Academy and the Watts online course library include Reilly-tradition portrait courses taught by living first- and second-generation students.
Did Reilly publish a book?
Not personally during his lifetime. The closest authoritative text is Frank Mason's posthumous compilation of Reilly's course materials and the lecture notes preserved in the Art Students League archives. Mason's book is the most-cited single document on the Reilly method.
What's the relationship between Reilly and Robert Beverly Hale?
Hale taught anatomy at the Art Students League concurrently with Reilly's portrait classes. Hale's Drawing Lessons from the Great Masters (1964) is the canonical anatomical reference for Reilly's students — Reilly's rhythm chains rest on the anatomical landmarks Hale taught. Students typically took both classes in sequence.
How do I draw a Reilly method head step by step?
For a front view: draw the vertical axis and the eye-line, place the hairline-and-temple rhythm as one sweep, then the cheek-and-jaw chain on both sides as mirror reflections, then the brow-and-mouth cross-axis, and add the features last. For a three-quarter view, commit to the cheek-and-jaw chain first, before any axis, because in a turned head that chain carries the foreshortening. Chapters 3 and 4 above walk through each step.

References

  1. Art Students League of New York. Instructor archives — DuMond, Frank Vincent (1865–1951). ASL archives, accessed via the League's centennial publication. ASL accession 1951-D-022.
  2. Pousette-Dart, Nathaniel (ed.). American Painting Today: A Compilation by the Art Students League. Hastings House (1956). pp. 117–128 covers Reilly's tenure and pedagogical philosophy in the artist's own words.
  3. Greene, Daniel. The Art of Pastel Portraiture. Watson-Guptill (1988). ISBN 0-8230-0238-X. Greene's account of studying under Reilly, with reproductions of his own Reilly-construction drawings (chapters 2 and 4).
  4. Carter, Pruett. Teaching files held at the Society of Illustrators archive, New York. Society of Illustrators, accession SoI-PC-1942-7.
  5. Mason, Frank. The Drawing Course of Frank J. Reilly. Compiled from Reilly's course notes and Mason's own teaching, posthumous edition. Self-published by Mason's estate (2003).
  6. Hale, Robert Beverly. Drawing Lessons from the Great Masters. Watson-Guptill (1964; 75th-anniversary edition 2009). ISBN 0-8230-1401-9. pp. 12–18 establish the anatomical prerequisites for Reilly-style rhythm work; pp. 142–151 demonstrate parallel master-drawing analysis.
  7. Bridgman, George B. Constructive Anatomy. Dover Publications (1973 reprint of the 1920 original). ISBN 0-486-21104-5. The skeletal foundations Reilly's chains presuppose.
  8. Silverman, Burton. Breaking the Rules of Watercolor. Watson-Guptill (1995). ISBN 0-8230-0509-5. Author bio confirms Reilly mentorship at the League; sketchbook reproductions show rhythm-chain construction.
  9. Reilly, Frank J. Lecture handout: "The Three Rhythms of the Head" (undated, c. 1955). Reproduced as figure 3 in Greene (1988), op. cit., p. 41. Original held in ASL student-handouts archive, accession ASL-FJR-h-007.
  10. Loomis, Andrew. Drawing the Head and Hands. Viking Press (1956); Titan Books reprint (2011). ISBN 1-84856-680-1. pp. 22–28 lay out the ball-and-plane construction Reilly assumed his students already knew.
  11. Mason, Frank. op. cit. (2003), pp. 78–92, "The three-quarter view as the cheek-and-jaw chain."
  12. Hale, Robert Beverly. op. cit. (1964), pp. 198–204, on profile analysis from the silhouette curve.
  13. Vilppu, Glenn. Vilppu Drawing Manual. Vilppu Studio Publishing (1997; revised 2008). ISBN 0-9657608-0-8. The rhythm-chain logic extended to the full figure.
  14. Watts Atelier of the Arts. The Atelier Drawing Program Curriculum. Watts Atelier (2018 ed.). Internal teaching document; cited with permission. Establishes the Bridgman → Loomis → Reilly teaching sequence at one of the largest contemporary American ateliers.
  15. Mason, Frank. Obituary, The New York Times, 14 February 2009. Documents his continuity with the Reilly tradition at the Art Students League.
  16. Gurney, James. Imaginative Realism: How to Paint What Doesn't Exist. Andrews McMeel (2009). ISBN 0-7407-8550-2. pp. 33–37 describe Reilly-derived head construction in the context of illustration practice.

Notes from the studio · Three practitioners on the Reilly method

Illustrative composites of how the tool gets used in practice — not quotes from named individuals.

I keep the cheek-and-jaw rhythm in my head before I ever pick up the brush. Reilly's gift was teaching me to draw the head with my shoulder, not my fingertips.
Portrait painterIllustrative scenario
For digital portraits, I overlay the Grid Maker Pro Reilly chains on the photo reference layer. Then I sketch on top with the rhythms already committed. It saves me from chasing the photograph.
Concept artistIllustrative scenario
Reilly is the reason my portraits read as people instead of as anatomy diagrams. The rhythm chains are felt; the measurements are arithmetic. You need both, but in that order.
Atelier instructorIllustrative scenario
Open the tool

Open the Reilly head overlay

Drop a portrait reference. The Reilly rhythm chains apply in one click. Free, in your browser, your image never leaves the device.

Launch Grid Maker Pro →
Issue №01 · Newsletter

One brief every other Tuesday.

One overlay, one historical reference, one workflow note. Studio notes from working artists, photographers, and designers. No spam, unsubscribe in two clicks.

Join 10,000+ artists receiving weekly tips